足不出户 走遍全世界
A | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.
The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.
"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.
While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."
The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.
The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.
The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.
Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.
The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.
The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.
A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.
The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.
The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.
UNI SM ING。 8月26日讯 佩德里最近接受采访，并谈到了自己的成长经历以及家庭与巴萨的羁绊。早在穿上红蓝战袍之前，巴萨就已经是佩德里及其家人生活的一部分。他的祖父创办了一个巴萨球迷会，后来由他的父亲接手，佩德里从小就在那里看比赛。他说道：“小时候我总是和父亲一起去那里看巴萨的所有比赛，我心里想着，希望有一天我能在巴萨踢球，让他们在球迷会里通过电视看到我。
B | ”这个梦想最终在2020年成真，当时年仅17岁的佩德里从拉斯帕尔马斯加盟巴萨，他回忆道：“我的梦想一直是能为巴萨踢球，并穿上8号球衣。当他们告诉我想要签下我时，我简直疯了。我妈妈哭了，我爸爸说他不相信，说这就是一场梦。
C | ”从那时起，佩德里从未忘记家人为他所做的一切，并且始终清楚自己想要回报他们的部分付出：“我希望有一天能帮助家人实现他们想要的一切，他们值得，因为他们把我照顾得这么好，我也会努力让我的兄弟什么都不缺。”家庭的重要性也体现在佩德里每次进球时，因为他有一个非常特别的举动来纪念他的祖母。他在庆祝时亲吻自己的手腕，以此把进球献给她，并铭记这位对他非常重要的人：“家人是我的一切，每次进球我都会亲吻手腕，把进球献给我的祖母。”尽管成名以来取得了一切成就，这位中场球员始终努力保持着童年时的那份平常心。也正是因为从小经历的一切，佩德里才如此清楚，当机会来临时，他想要帮助自己的家人。对他来说，能够以某种方式回报家人多年来所做的一切，是足球能带给他的最好的东西之一，超越冠军头衔或个人荣誉。
Current article:http://www.feizengbubaipeirangnalouchuo.sbs/stdl/park.docx
Published on:06:53:15
